Escrito por Gloria Gómez Diago (gracias)
De la web de estgate, recojo una trabajada clasificación de links o enlaces. Randy Trigg la propuso en 1983 ("A Network-Based Approach to Text Handling for the Online Scientific Community") refiriéndose a los tipos de enlaces que se establecen para componer textos científicos. Los agrupa en dos categorías: Normal links y Commentary links.
De la web de estgate, recojo una trabajada clasificación de links o enlaces. Randy Trigg la propuso en 1983 ("A Network-Based Approach to Text Handling for the Online Scientific Community") refiriéndose a los tipos de enlaces que se establecen para componer textos científicos. Los agrupa en dos categorías: Normal links y Commentary links.
Los primeros son los que conectan partes de un trabajo científico. Los segundos son los que ofrecen comentarios y críticas de este trabajo. Creo que son muy útiles calsificaciones como éstas para identificar los elementos que intervienen en el diseño de la comunicación (a pesar de que a veces no reflejen las interrelaciones/interseciones entre éstos). Aquí van:
Normal Links
Citation : (source, pioneer, credit, leads,eponym), Background, FutureWork, Refutation, Support, Methodology, Data, Generalize, Specialize, Abstraction, Example, Formalization, Application, Argument (deduction, induction, analogy, intuition, solution), Summarization, Detail, AlternateView, Rewrite, Explanation, Simplification, Complication, Update, Correction, Continuation.
Commentary Links
Comment (critical, supportive), RelatedWork (misrepresents, vacuum ignores, Is Superseded By, Is Refuted By, Is Supported By, redundant), Problem Posing (trivial, unimportant, impossible, ill-posed, solved ambitious), Thesis (trivial,unimportant, irrelevant, redherring, contradict, dubious, counterexample, inelegant, simplistic, arbitrary unmotivated, Argumentation (invalid, insufficient, immaterial misleading,alternative, strawman), Data (inadequate, dubious, ignores, irrelevant, inapplicable, misinterpreted), Style (boring, unimaginative, incoherent, arrogant, rambling, awkward)
Citation : (source, pioneer, credit, leads,eponym), Background, FutureWork, Refutation, Support, Methodology, Data, Generalize, Specialize, Abstraction, Example, Formalization, Application, Argument (deduction, induction, analogy, intuition, solution), Summarization, Detail, AlternateView, Rewrite, Explanation, Simplification, Complication, Update, Correction, Continuation.
Commentary Links
Comment (critical, supportive), RelatedWork (misrepresents, vacuum ignores, Is Superseded By, Is Refuted By, Is Supported By, redundant), Problem Posing (trivial, unimportant, impossible, ill-posed, solved ambitious), Thesis (trivial,unimportant, irrelevant, redherring, contradict, dubious, counterexample, inelegant, simplistic, arbitrary unmotivated, Argumentation (invalid, insufficient, immaterial misleading,alternative, strawman), Data (inadequate, dubious, ignores, irrelevant, inapplicable, misinterpreted), Style (boring, unimaginative, incoherent, arrogant, rambling, awkward)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario